New Evidence of Nancy Pelosi Associate Supporting Chavez, Marxists, & Terrorists:

Nancy Pelosi with Senator Piedad Córdoba



No wonder the Dems, including Obama have been fighting to block our trade with Pres Uribe of Columbia. He is credited with taking on both sides left and right guerrilla orgs and is condemned by Democrats because the Union lobby complains about the treatment of Unions in Columbia. Why, shouldn't our govt care about what happens here and don't they understand Uribe is fighting narco-terrorists and others and has had several assassination attempts? He has a lot more to deal with and should be congratulated, not degraded.

"A Colombian associate of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is once again linked to FARC terrorists and Marxist Dictator Hugo Chavez with the revelation of damning new messages concerning Colombian Senator Piedad Córdoba that are currently being investigated by Colombian military officials.

Córdoba, who works closely with Pelosi on Colombian and Venezuelan issues, has been linked to terrorists and Marxists in the past and has been a key player in helping undermine her own government. Sen Córdoba is prominently mentioned in emails and documents as attempting to create a "friends of Chavez" movement in Colombia, organized with the assistance of leaders of the Bolivarian Movement, a FARC sponsored terror groups."

Senator Piedad Córdoba has worked closely with various FARC terror leaders, she is pictured here with FARC leader Raul Reyes, later killed in Ecuador.



NewsBusters.org:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/10/15/new-evidence-nancy-pelosi-associate-supporting-chavez-marxists-t

University of Scranton: The silent treatment

I will not submit

Tuesday night at the University of Scranton some members of the sponsoring group were nervous. The university had taken much longer to approve my speaking at the campus than they had taken to approve other speakers, and had made the students answer all sorts of questions about whether the event would be in keeping with the mission of the university.

How about this for the mission of a university? Should it perchance be "the place to which a thousand schools make contributions; in which the intellect may safely range and speculate, sure to find its equal in some antagonist activity, and its judge in the tribunal of truth" Should it be a place where "inquiry is pushed forward, and discoveries verified and perfected, and rashness rendered innocuous, and error exposed, by the collision of mind with mind, and knowledge with knowledge"? (Thus Cardinal Newman.) Or should it be an indoctrination house for propagandists to stifle inquiry into and speculation about issues they wish not to be explored, as they interfere with the thrust of their propaganda?

I suspect they've already made their choice between those two at the University of Scranton, as well as at other once-fine universities all across the country, but they did let me speak Tuesday night. However, one of the members of the sponsoring group invited the local imam to come to the talk and make a five-minute rebuttal address after I spoke. I never did get the full story on this, but apparently he wanted to show the university administrators that the group was willing to air all points of view. I was asked Tuesday afternoon whether or not it would be acceptable to me if the imam spoke, and I said Absolutely Not. The group nevertheless seems to have asked him to speak, but he did not reply to their invitation.

Why did I oppose having the imam speak after me, when I profess to be so open to discussion and debate? Because what was proposed was not a debate or a dialogue, but my speech and his rebuttal. I would be happy to debate him if a debate were set up, and happy to answer his questions if he had deigned to show up at the talk, but not happy to have him come in to "correct" my remarks, as if there really were something wrong with what I am saying, such that someone is needed to come in afterward, smooth ruffled feathers, and issue a disclaimer.

Thus when I got to the venue I urged the sponsoring group not to allow themselves to be intimidated. Of course, that's easy for me to say: I don't have to live there for four years. I have immense respect for every member of this group, including the young man who suggested that the imam come in, because they hold to their principles under tremendous and often outrageous pressure from university administrators and their fellow students. Nevertheless, they and all students who are opposing the jihad and standing up for other politically incorrect positions should avoid allowing themselves to be put on the defensive and even tacitly accepting the Leftist/Jihadist line that what the anti-jihad stands for is bigotry, racism, hate, etc. It isn't. It is freedom, it is human rights, it is Western civilization, it is nothing for which to apologize, nothing of which to be ashamed.

Anyway, during the talk itself, which was apparently attended by at least some members of the campus MSA chapter, I noticed a number of students rolling their eyes and smiling in amused disgust at the egregious things I was saying. Since they did this frequently throughout the talk, I was ready for a barrage of hostile questions during the Q-and-A period. But none materialized. Not a single one of the eye-rollers approached the microphone to ask me even one question. So after a few questions from people in the audience who were sympathetic to what I was saying, the evening ended somewhat prematurely.

So all the MESA Nostra professors and all the MSA's loudly insist that I am wrong, wrong, wrong, and yet none of them dares to even try to prove it when I am right in front of them. Isn't that interesting?

full article:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023224.php

Mama is watching. PUMA. (people united means action)

So the multi-millionaire Barbie Boy wants to ridicule Sarah Palin for needing money to buy the clothes she MUST BUY to campaign for the White House. Nice. Barack Obama is a creep and a fraud, and if you are a Democrat who hasn’t figured this out yet, YOU ARE NOT PAYING ATTENTION! It never stops. Never. If Sarah had tried to campaign in the wardrobe she has hanging in her closet in Juno, the Ann Taylor suits that cost $148.99 and the three pairs of $200 shoes, the 4 jackets, six scarves, five handbags, and one pair scuffed gen-yoo-ine snakeskin boots with which every professional woman with children tries to look good while making do, she would have been HOUNDED RELENTLESSLY, ridiculed as a shabby, amateur hick in every media outlet in the universe. Just ask Michelle Obama. A very stylish lady, in my opinion. But nothing protects her either. She is ridiculed and hounded for wearing belts that are too big, dresses with floral prints,..

http://pumapac.org/

Pass on of the many ex-Hillary Dem sites to your lib friends, show them who's voting McCain/Palin. The hypocrisy and the venom that has defined the Party has them pissed. They're doing everything they can to stop Obama, including working to elect McCain. They do not like how he got the nomination and are appalled at the hate thrown Palins way. They don't see it as "going against their party" to vote for a Republican, it is going against the party that has no resemblance to the Democratic Party as they know it.

excerpt:

As I write this, the Dem Party is poised to nominate Barack Obama as its candidate for President of the United States. It's the triumph of fraud. I've spent months immersed in data from the 08 caucuses. After studying procedures/results from all 14 caucus states, interviewing witnesses, and reviewing hundreds of personal stories, my conclusion is that the Obama campaign willfully and intentionally defrauded the American public by undermining the caucus process

http://www.lynettelong.com/CAUCUSFRAUD/

Obama bill: $845 billion more for global poverty

Why is there no debate regarding this bill? It's flying under the radar, every so often you see a blog or a mention of it. Now were supposed to give our taxpayers dollars to the UN to spend how THEY feel they should? Unreal!

Many Americans were alerted to the legislation by a report from Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media. He published a critique asserting that while the Global Poverty Act sounds nice, the adoption could "result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States" and would make levels "of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."

He said the legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years he said would amount to $845 billion "over and above what the U.S. already spends."

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56405

It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us freedom of the press.

It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech. It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier, not the lawyer, who has given us the right to a fair trial. It is the soldier, who salutes the flag, who serves under the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag.... By Father Dennis Edward O'Brien, USMC

The Path To The Final Solution

Powerful video about how violence against Jews worldwide has grown, including America and Great Britian। Defend our ally Israel and fight Anti-Semitism around the world.
go to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDVaJXmCIjk

MEMRI (Middle Eastern Media Research Institute)is the leading organization for reporting what is being said, written about and debated on TV in the Middle East. These are the stories you won't hear on the MSM. They post the good and the bad so you get to see what is being said on both sides. The debate has begun. The extremist views are being condemned and confronted. The voices speaking out in favor of the US invasion of Iraq, the removal of Saddam is not being heard in the US, the US media won't report it.
The American people should know that there are brave writers, reporters, politicians and religious leaders who risk their lives and the lives of their families to speak out, yet our media ignores that kind of speech, that doesn't fit the playbook.

Get this widget!

Biden Mangles the Constitution

With all the people calling Sarah dumb and inexperienced, I'd take her experience as a Gov of Alaska,her determination to reform the way things are done in Washington over a bumbling, experienced, wrong on every foreign policy stand VP candidate and a inexperienced radical activist Presidential candidate. Here is an excerpt.

For a man of Biden's experience, this is a surprising series of misstatements. Firstl, he gets wrong one of the basic facts about the Constitution: Article 1 establishes the legislative branch, not the executive branch. This isn't exactly an obscure fact; my 17-year-old daughter pointed it out. 2nd, it simply isn't true that the Constitution treats the Vice President only as a member of the executive branch.

The Vice President is mentioned in Article II as part of the executive branch, but he is given legislative powers by Section 3 of Article 1, which establishes the Senate: The Vice Presiident of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

Go to Powerline for entire article:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/10/021676.php

Islamic 5th Column: Sharia-Compliant Finance coming to America

This is from one of my favorite blogs. From the Dissident Frogman.. excellent site.. he doesn't write often, but when he does he says it like it is (sometimes using rough language). He is one of American's best French friends, defending the US and calling the EU out, reporting on its dangerous and ignorant leaders.

Islamic 5th Column: Sharia-Compliant Finance coming to America

Think the subprime crisis was bad? Wait til you've seen financial Jihad.

Our Iwo Gina Early Warning System sounds the alarm: Wall Street, what's next?. Bits and pieces just to arouse and aggravate you enough to go there and read it all:

Tragically, in the process of leaping out of the scalding subprime frying pan, Wall Street is heading directly into a fire that promises, if anything, to be more devastating than the present disaster. Incredibly, it bears all the hallmarks of subprime with respect to a lack of transparency, a systematic failure to disclose and an utter absence of due diligence, good governance and accountability. The next "what" is called Shariah-Compliant Finance (SCF). Like subprime, it is a black box, in which management and investors alike are told to trust in the experts. In this case, the experts are Shariah authorities who are accorded exclusive responsibility for determining whether investments are "pure" (halal) and therefore acceptable, or "impure" (haram) and not.

David Yerushalmi, a litigator specializing in securities law and an expert on Shariah, produced a riveting legal memorandum (...) examining the civil and criminal exposure inherent in Shariah-Compliant Finance [Acrobat PDF — DF]. His conclusion: banks and investment houses offering SCF products may be enabling or engaging in the following: racketeering, antitrust activity, securities fraud, consumer fraud and/or material support for terror.

Read it all and start thinking about options and measures to take.