Col. Newlin and Iraqi leader Sheik Al TaminiI have been looking for the story about how Gen Petraeus worked for years to develop the strategy know as "the surge". I saw a documentary about it on Fox so I may need to try to buy a copy through them. It showed all the people the General interviewed and consulted with in order for him to develop the final draft. Pres Bush didn't have any solid strategy before Gen Petraeus wrote the handbook and as soon as he presented it to the President is was adopted as the way forward in Iraq. That didn't happen until 07, after the violence was spiraling out of control. Many times we talk about how the aftermath of the Iraq war was failing, falling into disarray and that was true. If it weren't for the insight and hard work of Gen Petraeus and our brave troops, we may still be struggling and never had the backing of the Sons of Iraq. This story about how the Army is transforming itself, I believe, is a direct result of that new forward moving strategy that we are now implementing and will be implementing in the future. Our military should be taking more responsibility in defending the aftermath of a war, taking over the security for the people directly affected rather than the private companies that are now performing that task, filling a void that our military should have been prepared for. This is a step in the right direction. We saw what happens when a brutal dictator is removed, where the people have been demoralized and victimized for decades and there is no set policy in place to secure the country. We will be better prepared for future conflicts. You can't expect a nation to build itself back up when there is no control and terrorists and hoodlums run the streets.
FORT LEAVENWORTH, Kan. (AP) - The Army has released its first new training field manual in six years, highlighting the need for units to be ready to conduct stability operations after traditional combat has ended.
The manual, titled "Training for Full Spectrum Operations" and written at Fort Leavenworth, explains what soldiers can expect when in combat.
It replaces a 2002 edition and comes on the heels of the Army's release earlier this year of its latest operations doctrine, which emphasized that soldiers must be prepared and proficient in offense, defense and stability skills. The Army says it is the first time it has synchronized the manuals for operations and training.
Army officials say the latest manual released Tuesday is a reflection of the past seven years of conflict in Afghanistan and Iraq and a reality that units will be in a period of "persistent conflict" for years to come.
"While we will never be able to fully comprehend the thousands of variables in a complex system, we can train to recognize those which are found in most. So the first time our soldiers come across a certain type of situation is in training, not on the battlefield," said Maj. Michael Sullivan, 36, of Bardonia, N.Y., and a planner with the 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Stewart, Ga.
The manual's release comes as the U.S. prepares to reduce its forces in Iraq and shift the focus to Afghanistan, where commanders have requested as many as 20,000 additional troops.
Brig. Gen. Robert B. Abrams, commander of Fort Leavenworth's Combined Arms Center-Training, said units will have to deal with the current conflicts and still be able to wage conventional warfare against large enemy formations.
The task may seem daunting, Abrams said, but the training doctrine reflects the combat situations units already have faced in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"Our soldiers and our formations are up to this. They do it every single day," Abrams said. "This is about codifying what they've already been doing and putting it in our doctrine so we don't lose sight of our capability."
The manual also refers to units training for homeland security missions, such as helping with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2006 and the potential for another Sept. 11-style attack.
"It means you're training America's Army to meet all possible contingencies," said House Armed Services Chairman Rep. Ike Skelton.
He said the manual was "quite ambitious" but necessary.
"It's asking a lot of soldier, but today's environment is so different than World War II or Korea," said Skelton, D-Mo. "It deals with civil affairs. We have not been as active military in civil affairs in recent years. This puts it front and center."
Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Chiarelli said he was aware of concerns among some policymakers and military leaders that the Army is too focused on counterinsurgency, the type of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Critics have said the Army may lose its ability to respond to NATO obligations.
Chiarelli said soldiers already go from stability operations in neighborhoods to high-intensity combat and back to stability "in a wink of an eye." That flexibility isn't something U.S. forces were immediately prepared to do when they trained for Iraq in 2002 and 2003.
"I don't worry about that," Chiarelli said.
Col. Joseph Martin, commander of Fort Riley's 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, said in an e-mail Tuesday from Iraq that his units used a draft of the training manual earlier this year to prepare for deployment.
"The Army has crafted a model that establishes a balance between being trained for mid- to high-level intensity combat operations and the rigors of the current conflict against terror," said Martin, 44, of Dearborn, Mich.
No comments:
Post a Comment